Egypt vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Egypt
42 number
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
42 number
in 2014
Egypt rank
46th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
46th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Egypt
  • Trinidad and Tobago
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 42 number against 42 number in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 46th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 46th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 42 number 42 number 0 number
2010s 42 number 42 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Egypt or Trinidad and Tobago?
Egypt, at 42 number against 42 number in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Egypt and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 number, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Trinidad and Tobago?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Egypt and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Egypt ranks 46th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.