Djibouti vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Djibouti
40 number
in 2014
East Timor
51 number
in 2014
Djibouti rank
1st
East Timor rank
3rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Djibouti
  • East Timor
0204060200420092014

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 51 number against 40 number in Djibouti, a difference of 11 number.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.3 times Djibouti's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 3rd of 1 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 40 number 51 number 11 number East Timor
2010s 40 number 51 number 11 number East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Djibouti or East Timor?
East Timor, at 51 number against 40 number in Djibouti as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Djibouti and East Timor?
11 number, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and East Timor?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Djibouti and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Djibouti ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 3rd of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.