Czechia vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Czechia
- Latvia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 27 number against 27 number in Latvia, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 171st and Latvia ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.29 number | 27.86 number | 0.5714 number | Latvia |
| 2010s | 27 number | 27 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Czechia or Latvia?
- Czechia, at 27 number against 27 number in Latvia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Czechia and Latvia?
- 0 number, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Czechia ranks 171st and Latvia ranks 171st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.