Czechia vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Czechia
27 number
in 2014
Hong Kong
26 number
in 2014
Czechia rank
171st
Hong Kong rank
174th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Czechia
  • Hong Kong
0102030200320082014

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 27 number against 26 number in Hong Kong, a difference of 1 number.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 171st and Hong Kong ranks 174th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2000s 27.29 number 27 number 0.2857 number Czechia
2010s 27 number 26.6 number 0.4 number Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Czechia or Hong Kong?
Czechia, at 27 number against 26 number in Hong Kong as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Czechia and Hong Kong?
1 number, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hong Kong?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Czechia and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Czechia ranks 171st and Hong Kong ranks 174th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.