Cote d'Ivoire vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- South Korea
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 32 number against 32 number in South Korea, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Korea ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 149th and South Korea ranks 149th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33 number | 34 number | 1 number | South Korea |
| 2010s | 32.6 number | 32.4 number | 0.2 number | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Cote d'Ivoire or South Korea?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 32 number against 32 number in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea?
- 0 number, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 149th and South Korea ranks 149th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.