Costa Rica vs Guinea-Bissau: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Costa Rica
40 number
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau
40 number
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
60th
Guinea-Bissau rank
60th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Guinea-Bissau
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 40 number against 40 number in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 181 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 40 number 41 number 1 number Guinea-Bissau
2010s 40 number 40 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Costa Rica or Guinea-Bissau?
Costa Rica, at 40 number against 40 number in Guinea-Bissau as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?
0 number, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Costa Rica and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Costa Rica ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.