Democratic Republic of Congo vs Laos: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Laos
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 43 number against 43 number in Laos, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 40th and Laos ranks 40th of 184 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.57 number | 43 number | 0.5714 number | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 43 number | 43 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Democratic Republic of Congo or Laos?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 43 number against 43 number in Laos as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Democratic Republic of Congo and Laos?
- 0 number, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Laos?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Laos rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 40th and Laos ranks 40th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.