Colombia vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Colombia
33 number
in 2014
Poland
33 number
in 2014
Colombia rank
140th
Poland rank
140th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Colombia
  • Poland
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 33 number against 33 number in Poland, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 140th and Poland ranks 140th of 181 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 33.43 number 37 number 3.57 number Poland
2010s 33 number 34.6 number 1.6 number Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Colombia or Poland?
Colombia, at 33 number against 33 number in Poland as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Colombia and Poland?
0 number, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Poland?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Colombia and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Colombia ranks 140th and Poland ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.