China vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

China
37 number
in 2014
Tonga
37 number
in 2014
China rank
95th
Tonga rank
95th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • China
  • Tonga
010203040200320082014

How they compare

China currently reports 37 number against 37 number in Tonga, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

China ranks 95th and Tonga ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 37 number 37 number 0 number β€”
2010s 37 number 37 number 0 number β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, China or Tonga?
China, at 37 number against 37 number in Tonga as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between China and Tonga?
0 number, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tonga?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do China and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
China ranks 95th and Tonga ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.