China vs Lebanon: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
China
37 number
in 2014
Lebanon
37 number
in 2014
China rank
95th
Lebanon rank
95th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- China
- Lebanon
How they compare
China currently reports 37 number against 37 number in Lebanon, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
China ranks 95th and Lebanon ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37 number | 37 number | 0 number | — |
| 2010s | 37 number | 37 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, China or Lebanon?
- China, at 37 number against 37 number in Lebanon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between China and Lebanon?
- 0 number, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lebanon?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do China and Lebanon rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- China ranks 95th and Lebanon ranks 95th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.