Central African Republic vs Cyprus: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Central African Republic
43 number
in 2014
Cyprus
43 number
in 2014
Central African Republic rank
38th
Cyprus rank
38th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Cyprus
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 43 number against 43 number in Cyprus, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 38th and Cyprus ranks 38th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Cyprus Difference Ahead
2000s 43 number 43 number 0 number
2010s 43 number 43 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Central African Republic or Cyprus?
Central African Republic, at 43 number against 43 number in Cyprus as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Central African Republic and Cyprus?
0 number, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Cyprus?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Central African Republic and Cyprus rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Central African Republic ranks 38th and Cyprus ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.