Cameroon vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Cameroon
42 number
in 2014
Malawi
42 number
in 2014
Cameroon rank
46th
Malawi rank
46th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Cameroon
  • Malawi
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 42 number against 42 number in Malawi, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malawi ahead.

Cameroon ranks 46th and Malawi ranks 46th of 181 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 43 number 42.57 number 0.4286 number Cameroon
2010s 42.4 number 42 number 0.4 number Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Cameroon or Malawi?
Cameroon, at 42 number against 42 number in Malawi as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Cameroon and Malawi?
0 number, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Malawi?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cameroon and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Cameroon ranks 46th and Malawi ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.