Cambodia vs Kenya: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Cambodia
44 number
in 2014
Kenya
44 number
in 2014
Cambodia rank
28th
Kenya rank
28th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Cambodia
  • Kenya
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 44 number against 44 number in Kenya, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 44 number 40 number 4 number Cambodia
2010s 44 number 42.4 number 1.6 number Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Cambodia or Kenya?
Cambodia, at 44 number against 44 number in Kenya as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Cambodia and Kenya?
0 number, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Kenya?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Kenya rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Cambodia ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.