Cape Verde vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Cape Verde
37 number
in 2014
Philippines
37 number
in 2014
Cape Verde rank
95th
Philippines rank
95th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Philippines
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 37 number against 37 number in Philippines, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 95th and Philippines ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 37 number 37 number 0 number
2010s 37 number 37 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Cape Verde or Philippines?
Cape Verde, at 37 number against 37 number in Philippines as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Cape Verde and Philippines?
0 number, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Philippines?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cape Verde and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Cape Verde ranks 95th and Philippines ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.