Bulgaria vs Cape Verde: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Bulgaria
37 number
in 2014
Cape Verde
37 number
in 2014
Bulgaria rank
95th
Cape Verde rank
95th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Cape Verde
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 37 number against 37 number in Cape Verde, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 95th and Cape Verde ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Cape Verde Difference Ahead
2000s 37.6 number 37 number 0.6 number Bulgaria
2010s 37 number 37 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Bulgaria or Cape Verde?
Bulgaria, at 37 number against 37 number in Cape Verde as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Bulgaria and Cape Verde?
0 number, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Cape Verde?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Bulgaria and Cape Verde rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Bulgaria ranks 95th and Cape Verde ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.