Brunei vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Brunei
47 number
in 2014
Mauritania
46 number
in 2014
Brunei rank
14th
Mauritania rank
17th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Brunei
  • Mauritania
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Brunei currently reports 47 number against 46 number in Mauritania, a difference of 1 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mauritania ahead.

Brunei ranks 14th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 47 number 46.25 number 0.75 number Brunei
2010s 47 number 46 number 1 number Brunei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Brunei or Mauritania?
Brunei, at 47 number against 46 number in Mauritania as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Brunei and Mauritania?
1 number, with Brunei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Mauritania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Brunei and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Brunei ranks 14th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.