Brazil vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Brazil
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 43.61 number against 43 number in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.61 number.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.17 number | 43 number | 2.17 number | Brazil |
| 2010s | 44.24 number | 43 number | 1.24 number | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Brazil or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Brazil, at 43.61 number against 43 number in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.61 number, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Brazil ranks 37th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 38th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.