Brazil vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Brazil
- Democratic Republic of Congo
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 43.61 number against 43 number in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.61 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 37th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 38th of 181 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Democratic Republic of Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.29 number | 43.57 number | 1.71 number | Brazil |
| 2010s | 44.24 number | 43 number | 1.24 number | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Brazil or Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Brazil, at 43.61 number against 43 number in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 0.61 number, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Brazil ranks 37th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 38th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.