Bhutan vs Grenada: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Bhutan
- Grenada
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 47 number against 46 number in Grenada, a difference of 1 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.
Bhutan ranks 14th and Grenada ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47 number | 46.6 number | 0.4 number | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 47 number | 46 number | 1 number | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Bhutan or Grenada?
- Bhutan, at 47 number against 46 number in Grenada as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Bhutan and Grenada?
- 1 number, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Grenada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bhutan and Grenada rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Bhutan ranks 14th and Grenada ranks 17th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.