Benin vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Benin
41 number
in 2014
Uzbekistan
41 number
in 2014
Benin rank
51st
Uzbekistan rank
51st

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Benin
  • Uzbekistan
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Benin currently reports 41 number against 41 number in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Benin ranks 51st and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 42 number 42 number 0 number
2010s 41.8 number 41.6 number 0.2 number Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Benin or Uzbekistan?
Benin, at 41 number against 41 number in Uzbekistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Benin and Uzbekistan?
0 number, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Uzbekistan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Benin and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Benin ranks 51st and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.