Belgium vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 27 number against 26 number in Belgium, a difference of 1 number.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Belgium ranks 177th and Latvia ranks 174th of 184 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.43 number | 27.86 number | 0.4286 number | Latvia |
| 2010s | 26 number | 27 number | 1 number | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Belgium or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 27 number against 26 number in Belgium as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Belgium and Latvia?
- 1 number, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Belgium ranks 177th and Latvia ranks 174th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.