Belgium vs Iceland: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Belgium
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 27 number against 26 number in Belgium, a difference of 1 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 174th and Iceland ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.33 number | 27 number | 0.3333 number | Belgium |
| 2010s | 26 number | 27 number | 1 number | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Belgium or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 27 number against 26 number in Belgium as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Belgium and Iceland?
- 1 number, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Belgium and Iceland rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Belgium ranks 174th and Iceland ranks 171st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.