Bangladesh vs Benin: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Bangladesh
41 number
in 2014
Benin
41 number
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
51st
Benin rank
51st

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Benin
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 41 number against 41 number in Benin, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Benin has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 51st and Benin ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Benin Difference Ahead
2000s 41 number 42 number 1 number Benin
2010s 41 number 41.8 number 0.8 number Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Bangladesh or Benin?
Bangladesh, at 41 number against 41 number in Benin as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Bangladesh and Benin?
0 number, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Benin?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Bangladesh and Benin rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Bangladesh ranks 51st and Benin ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.