Bahamas vs Honduras: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Bahamas
48 number
in 2014
Honduras
47 number
in 2014
Bahamas rank
12th
Honduras rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Bahamas
  • Honduras
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 48 number against 47 number in Honduras, a difference of 1 number.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 12th and Honduras ranks 14th of 181 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Honduras Difference Ahead
2000s 48 number 45 number 3 number Bahamas
2010s 48 number 46.6 number 1.4 number Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Bahamas or Honduras?
Bahamas, at 48 number against 47 number in Honduras as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Bahamas and Honduras?
1 number, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Honduras?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahamas and Honduras rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Bahamas ranks 12th and Honduras ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.