Austria vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Austria
- Rwanda
How they compare
Austria currently reports 25 number against 23 number in Rwanda, a difference of 2 number.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 181st and Rwanda ranks 182nd of 184 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.14 number | 24.57 number | 1.57 number | Austria |
| 2010s | 25 number | 23.4 number | 1.6 number | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Austria or Rwanda?
- Austria, at 25 number against 23 number in Rwanda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Austria and Rwanda?
- 2 number, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Austria ranks 181st and Rwanda ranks 182nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.