Argentina vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Argentina
36 number
in 2014
Seychelles
36 number
in 2014
Argentina rank
108th
Seychelles rank
108th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Argentina
  • Seychelles
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 36 number against 36 number in Seychelles, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 108th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 181 countries.

Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 36 number 37 number 1 number Seychelles
2010s 36 number 36.8 number 0.8 number Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Argentina or Seychelles?
Argentina, at 36 number against 36 number in Seychelles as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Argentina and Seychelles?
0 number, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Seychelles?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Argentina and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Argentina ranks 108th and Seychelles ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.