Antigua and Barbuda vs Kenya: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Antigua and Barbuda
44 number
in 2014
Kenya
44 number
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
28th
Kenya rank
28th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Kenya
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 44 number against 44 number in Kenya, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 44.6 number 40 number 4.6 number Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 44 number 42.4 number 1.6 number Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Antigua and Barbuda or Kenya?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 44 number against 44 number in Kenya as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Antigua and Barbuda and Kenya?
0 number, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Kenya?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Kenya rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.