Angola vs Honduras: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Angola
46 number
in 2014
Honduras
47 number
in 2014
Angola rank
17th
Honduras rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Angola
  • Honduras
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 47 number against 46 number in Angola, a difference of 1 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 17th and Honduras ranks 14th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Honduras Difference Ahead
2000s 46 number 45 number 1 number Angola
2010s 46 number 46.6 number 0.6 number Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Angola or Honduras?
Honduras, at 47 number against 46 number in Angola as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Angola and Honduras?
1 number, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Honduras?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Angola and Honduras rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Angola ranks 17th and Honduras ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.