Algeria vs Taiwan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Algeria
45 number
in 2014
Taiwan
45 number
in 2014
Algeria rank
26th
Taiwan rank
26th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Algeria
  • Taiwan
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 45 number against 45 number in Taiwan, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Algeria ahead.

Algeria ranks 26th and Taiwan ranks 26th of 181 countries.

Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 46.71 number 45 number 1.71 number Algeria
2010s 45 number 45 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Algeria or Taiwan?
Algeria, at 45 number against 45 number in Taiwan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Algeria and Taiwan?
0 number, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Taiwan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Algeria and Taiwan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Algeria ranks 26th and Taiwan ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.