Tajikistan vs Turkey: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Tajikistan
56.25
in 2014
Turkey
56.25
in 2014
Tajikistan rank
54th
Turkey rank
54th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Turkey
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Turkey, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Tajikistan ranks 54th and Turkey ranks 54th of 181 countries.

Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 56.25 51.25 5 Tajikistan
2010s 56.25 53.75 2.5 Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Tajikistan or Turkey?
Tajikistan, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Turkey as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Tajikistan and Turkey?
0, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Turkey?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Tajikistan and Turkey rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Tajikistan ranks 54th and Turkey ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.