Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
28.12
in 2014
Suriname
28.12
in 2014
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
146th
Suriname rank
146th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Suriname
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 28.12 against 28.12 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.25 | 28.12 | 1.88 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 28.12 | 28.12 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Suriname?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 28.12 against 28.12 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Suriname?
- 0, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 146th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.