Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Taiwan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Saint Kitts and Nevis
21.88
in 2014
Taiwan
25
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
157th
Taiwan rank
155th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Taiwan
0510152025200320082014

How they compare

Taiwan currently reports 25 against 21.88 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 3.12.

That makes Taiwan's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 157th and Taiwan ranks 155th of 181 countries.

Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 20 25 5 Taiwan
2010s 21.88 25 3.12 Taiwan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Taiwan?
Taiwan, at 25 against 21.88 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan?
3.12, with Taiwan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Taiwan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 157th and Taiwan ranks 155th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.