Sierra Leone vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Sierra Leone
43.75
in 2014
Tunisia
43.75
in 2014
Sierra Leone rank
100th
Tunisia rank
100th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Tunisia
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Sierra Leone ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 100th of 181 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 40.62 43.75 3.12 Tunisia
2010s 43.12 43.75 0.625 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Sierra Leone or Tunisia?
Sierra Leone, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Tunisia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Sierra Leone and Tunisia?
0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Tunisia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Sierra Leone and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Sierra Leone ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.