Sao Tome and Principe vs Senegal: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Sao Tome and Principe
31.25
in 2014
Senegal
31.25
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe rank
138th
Senegal rank
138th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Senegal
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Senegal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th and Senegal ranks 138th of 184 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 28.12 | 3.12 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 30.62 | 0.625 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Sao Tome and Principe or Senegal?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Senegal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Sao Tome and Principe and Senegal?
- 0, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Senegal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Senegal rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 138th and Senegal ranks 138th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.