Rwanda vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Rwanda
93.75
in 2014
Singapore
100
in 2014
Rwanda rank
3rd
Singapore rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Rwanda
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 100 against 93.75 in Rwanda, a difference of 6.25.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.84 | 100 | 11.16 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 92.5 | 100 | 7.5 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Rwanda or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 100 against 93.75 in Rwanda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Rwanda and Singapore?
- 6.25, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Rwanda and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Rwanda ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 1st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.