Qatar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Qatar
31.25
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
31.25
in 2014
Qatar rank
137th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Qatar
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0102030200420092014

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Qatar ranks 137th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 31.25 31.25 0
2010s 31.25 31.25 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Qatar or Sao Tome and Principe?
Qatar, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Qatar and Sao Tome and Principe?
0, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Sao Tome and Principe?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Qatar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Qatar ranks 137th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.