Puerto Rico vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Puerto Rico
43.75
in 2014
Tunisia
43.75
in 2014
Puerto Rico rank
100th
Tunisia rank
100th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Puerto Rico
- Tunisia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 43.75 against 43.75 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 100th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.75 | 43.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 43.75 | 43.75 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Puerto Rico or Tunisia?
- Puerto Rico, at 43.75 against 43.75 in Tunisia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Puerto Rico and Tunisia?
- 0, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Puerto Rico and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Puerto Rico ranks 100th and Tunisia ranks 100th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.