Nigeria vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Nigeria
39.91
in 2014
Uzbekistan
37.5
in 2014
Nigeria rank
123rd
Uzbekistan rank
124th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Nigeria
  • Uzbekistan
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 39.91 against 37.5 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2.41.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Nigeria ranks 123rd and Uzbekistan ranks 124th of 181 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 39.29 34.38 4.91 Nigeria
2010s 40.34 35.62 4.71 Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Nigeria or Uzbekistan?
Nigeria, at 39.91 against 37.5 in Uzbekistan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Nigeria and Uzbekistan?
2.41, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Uzbekistan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Nigeria and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Nigeria ranks 123rd and Uzbekistan ranks 124th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.