Mozambique vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Mozambique
71.88
in 2014
Vanuatu
71.88
in 2014
Mozambique rank
19th
Vanuatu rank
19th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mozambique
  • Vanuatu
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 71.88 against 71.88 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 19th and Vanuatu ranks 19th of 181 countries.

Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 67.86 71.88 4.02 Vanuatu
2010s 71.88 71.88 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Mozambique or Vanuatu?
Mozambique, at 71.88 against 71.88 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Mozambique and Vanuatu?
0, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Vanuatu?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Mozambique and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Mozambique ranks 19th and Vanuatu ranks 19th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.