Micronesia (country) vs Portugal: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Micronesia (country)
59.38
in 2014
Portugal
59.38
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
44th
Portugal rank
44th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Portugal
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 59.38 against 59.38 in Portugal, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 44th and Portugal ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.38 | 49.55 | 9.82 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 59.38 | 59.38 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Micronesia (country) or Portugal?
- Micronesia (country), at 59.38 against 59.38 in Portugal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Micronesia (country) and Portugal?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Portugal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Portugal rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 44th and Portugal ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.