Mauritius vs Portugal: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Mauritius
59.38
in 2014
Portugal
59.38
in 2014
Mauritius rank
44th
Portugal rank
44th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Portugal
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 59.38 against 59.38 in Portugal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 44th and Portugal ranks 44th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 50.52 49.48 1.04 Mauritius
2010s 55 59.38 4.38 Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Mauritius or Portugal?
Mauritius, at 59.38 against 59.38 in Portugal as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Mauritius and Portugal?
0, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Portugal?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mauritius and Portugal rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Mauritius ranks 44th and Portugal ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.