Mauritius vs Norway: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Mauritius
59.38
in 2014
Norway
59.38
in 2014
Mauritius rank
44th
Norway rank
44th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Norway
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 59.38 against 59.38 in Norway, a difference of 0.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 44th and Norway ranks 44th of 181 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 50.52 59.38 8.85 Norway
2010s 55 59.38 4.38 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Mauritius or Norway?
Mauritius, at 59.38 against 59.38 in Norway as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Mauritius and Norway?
0, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Mauritius ranks 44th and Norway ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.