Mauritius vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Mauritius
59.38
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
59.38
in 2014
Mauritius rank
44th
Micronesia (country) rank
44th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 59.38 against 59.38 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.52 | 59.38 | 8.85 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 55 | 59.38 | 4.38 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Mauritius or Micronesia (country)?
- Mauritius, at 59.38 against 59.38 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Mauritius and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Micronesia (country)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 44th and Micronesia (country) ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.