Mauritania vs Saint Lucia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Mauritania
21.88
in 2014
Saint Lucia
21.88
in 2014
Mauritania rank
157th
Saint Lucia rank
157th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mauritania
  • Saint Lucia
05101520200320082014

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 157th and Saint Lucia ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 20.62 20 0.625 Mauritania
2010s 21.88 21.88 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Mauritania or Saint Lucia?
Mauritania, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Mauritania and Saint Lucia?
0, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Saint Lucia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mauritania and Saint Lucia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Mauritania ranks 157th and Saint Lucia ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.