Mauritania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Mauritania
21.88
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
21.88
in 2014
Mauritania rank
157th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
157th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Mauritania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mauritania ranks 157th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.62 | 20 | 0.625 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 21.88 | 21.88 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Mauritania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritania, at 21.88 against 21.88 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Mauritania ranks 157th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 157th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.