Maldives vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Maldives
37.5
in 2014
Nigeria
39.91
in 2014
Maldives rank
124th
Nigeria rank
123rd
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Maldives
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 39.91 against 37.5 in Maldives, a difference of 2.41.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 124th and Nigeria ranks 123rd of 181 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 39.29 | 1.79 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 40.34 | 2.84 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Maldives or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 39.91 against 37.5 in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Maldives and Nigeria?
- 2.41, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Nigeria?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Maldives and Nigeria rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Maldives ranks 124th and Nigeria ranks 123rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.