Malaysia vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Malaysia
75
in 2014
United Kingdom
75
in 2014
Malaysia rank
14th
United Kingdom rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Malaysia
  • United Kingdom
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 75 against 75 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 14th and United Kingdom ranks 14th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 71.88 68.75 3.12 Malaysia
2010s 74.38 75 0.625 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Malaysia or United Kingdom?
Malaysia, at 75 against 75 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Malaysia and United Kingdom?
0, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United Kingdom?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Malaysia and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Malaysia ranks 14th and United Kingdom ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.