How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?

12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Malawi

34.38

in 2014

Papua New Guinea

34.38

in 2014

Malawi rank

132nd

Papua New Guinea rank

132nd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

Malawi
Papua New Guinea

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 34.38 against 34.38 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Malawi ranks 132nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 132nd of 181 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	Papua New Guinea	Difference	Ahead
2000s	32.59	31.7	0.8929	Malawi
2010s	34.38	34.38	0	—

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Malawi or Papua New Guinea?: Malawi, at 34.38 against 34.38 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Malawi and Papua New Guinea?: 0, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Papua New Guinea?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Malawi and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?: Malawi ranks 132nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 132nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.