Lebanon vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Lebanon
50
in 2014
Mexico
50.53
in 2014
Lebanon rank
76th
Mexico rank
75th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Lebanon
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 50.53 against 50 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 76th and Mexico ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 46.88 | 3.12 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 50 | 48.96 | 1.04 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Lebanon or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 50.53 against 50 in Lebanon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Lebanon and Mexico?
- 0.53, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Lebanon and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Lebanon ranks 76th and Mexico ranks 75th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.