Kuwait vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Kuwait
9.38
in 2014
East Timor
6.25
in 2014
Kuwait rank
175th
East Timor rank
176th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Kuwait
  • East Timor
0246810200320082014

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 9.38 against 6.25 in East Timor, a difference of 3.13.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.5 times East Timor's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 175th and East Timor ranks 176th of 181 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 9.38 6.25 3.12 Kuwait
2010s 9.38 6.25 3.12 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Kuwait or East Timor?
Kuwait, at 9.38 against 6.25 in East Timor as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Kuwait and East Timor?
3.13, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and East Timor?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Kuwait and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Kuwait ranks 175th and East Timor ranks 176th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.